What is “fascism”? Robert O. Paxton describes it as having the following fundamental characteristics. Can any of them be attributed to Israel?
— a sense of overwhelming crisis beyond the reach of any traditional solutions;
✅
—belief in the primacy of the group, to which one has obligations superior to all rights, whether individual or universal, and the subordination of the individual to the group;
✅
— the belief that the group is a victim, thus justifying any action against its enemies, both internal and external;
✅
— dread of the group’s decline under the corrosive effects of individual liberalism, class conflict and alien influences;
✅
— the need for closer integration of a purer community, either by consent or by force;
✅
— the need for authority of natural chiefs, culminating in one national chieftain; the superiority of the leader’s instincts over abstract and universal reason;
❓
— the beauty of violence and the efficacy of will, when devoted to the group’s success;
✅
— the right of the chosen people to dominate others without restraint of any kind of human or divine law, while the sole criterion defining it is the group’s prowess within a Darwinian struggle.
✅
— Robert O. Paxton, The anatomy of fascism
The only characteristic of a fascist state that seems to be missing is that of a dictator. I’ll come back to this.
Let’s dig deeper.
Revisionist Zionism, an open advocate of fascism, was officially founded in 1925 by Ze’ev Jabotinsky.
Wolfgang von Weisl joined Jabotinsky in 1925 to become one of founders of revisionists. He was JABOTINSKY’s financial director. And a supporter of fascism. He described the victory of fascist Italy over Abyssinia (Ethiopia) as “a triumph of the White races against the Black”
—“Dr. von Weisl Believes in Fascism,” 6/12/34 World Jewry, a London Jewish establishment journal.
Wolfgang von Weisl
Abba Ahime’ir joined JABOTINSKY’s revisionist movement and became a central activist in 1928.
[He did not support] “the free entrance of Jews to our land, but only the free entrance of Zionists. Zionists are the only ones we need here”.
He believed that the only solution to the “Jewish problem” was their evacuation from Europe to Palestine.
In his column“From a Fascist’s Notebook,» Do’ar ha-Yom:
“They frighten us with a scarecrow called ‘separation.’ But separation is the path taken by the national movements that are affiliated with the glorious names of Ataturk, Mussolini, Pilsudski, de Valera,Hitler.”
— Abba Achimeir, 1933
http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/the-makings-of-history/words-that-can-t-be-retracted-1.425541
[NOTE: de Valera, the Irish premier who took the reigns in Ireland after the British were removed has NO place among that lot!]
ABBA ACHIMEIR
Abraham Stern, founder of the National Military Organization (NMO, a splinter group from Irgun) would also join JABOTINSKY’s ranks.
In 1940, Stern wrote:
[The NMO, believed that] “a community of interests may be established between the attempt to enact a new order in Europe according to the German concept, and the real national aspirations of the Jewish people, which are represented by the NMO”
[Hence] “a cooperation between New Germany and a renewed, popular-national Hebrewness would be possible”
[Therefore,] “the Israelite liberty movement offered active participation in the war on the German side” [with the aim of] “establishing the historical State of the Jews on national and totalitarian principles”
Abraham Stern
Benzion Netanyahu, (Benzion Mileikowsky), father of and major influence on Benjamin, was a longtime advocate of JABOTINSKY and was his one-time secretary.
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Benzion-Netanyahu
JABOTINSKY
JABOTINSKY wrote “The Iron Wall” in 1923.
Remember that at the time of writing this, Jews made up just TEN PERCENT of the population. And not all of them were zionist Jews:
“There can be no voluntary agreement between ourselves and the PALESTINE Arabs. Not now, nor in the prospective future. I say this with such conviction, not because I want to hurt the moderate Zionists. I do not believe that they will be hurt. Except for those who were born blind, they realised long ago that it is utterly impossible to obtain the voluntary consent of the PALESTINE Arabs for converting “PALESTINE” from an Arab country into a country with a Jewish majority.
My readers have a general idea of the history of COLONIZATION in other countries. I suggest that they consider all the precedents with which they are acquainted, and see whether there is one solitary instance of any COLONIZATION being carried on with the consent of the NATIVE POPULATION. There is no such precedent.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Zionism/ironwall.html
His solution?
“if we desire that Eretz Yisrael should become and remain a Jewish State, we must first of all create a Jewish majority”
— JABOTINSKY
http://www.palestineremembered.com/Acre/Famous-Zionist-Quotes/Story2320.html
He would also praise Hitler’s attitude to “mixed races”:
“The world has become accustomed to the idea of mass migrations and has become fond of them.” He later added, “Hitler— as odious as he is to us—has given this idea a good name in the world.”
— JABOTINSKY, One Palestine Complete, p. 407
JABOTINSKY would found the right-wing zionist youth movement Betar in 1923.
“Yes, we Revisionists have a great admiration for Hitler. Hitler has saved Germany. Otherwise it would have perished within four years. And if he had given up his anti-Semitism we would go with him.”
— Opening statement of lawyer defending Betar students, 1932
— Elis Lubrany, ‘Hitler in Jerusalem’, Weltbahne (Berlin, 31 May 1932), p. 835.
Betar in Germany 1936
In November 1934, MUSSOLINI set up a Betar (founded by JABOTINSKY) squadron at his scubla marittima at Civitavecchia, where 134 cadets were trained by the notorious Blackshirts; in 1936, Il Duce himself reviewed his Zionist wards.
— Zionist-Revisionism: The Years of Fascism and Terror, LENNI BRENNER
Betar navy in Mussolini’s Italy 1934
“Professor Sacerdoti (zionist leader in Italy) is persuaded that many of the fundamental principles of the Fascist Doctrine…. are no more or less than Jewish principles.”
— Guido Bedarida, ‘The Jews under Mussolini’, Reflex (October 1927), p.58.
Irgun, the militant face of revisionist zionists were formed in 1931.
“The policy of the new organization was based squarely on Jabotinsky’s teachings: every Jew had the right to enter Palestine; only active retaliation would deter the Arabs; only Jewish armed force would ensure the Jewish state»
— Howard Sachar: A History of Israel: From the Rise of Zionism to Our Time, pp. 265–266
In the second half of 1940, a few members of the Irgun Zvai Leumi (National Military Organization) – the anti-British terrorist group sponsored by the Revisionists and known by its acronym Etzel, and to the British simply as the Irgun – made contact with representatives of Fascist Italy, offering to cooperate against the British.
— Tom Segev, Haim Watzman. The Seventh Million. p. 33
«Articles in contemporary Lehi publications talked about the Jewish nation as a heroic people, even a ‘master race’ (in contrast to the Arabs, who were considered a nation of slaves)»
— Jabotinsky and the Revisionist Movement 1925-1948 Yaacov Shavit Routledge; 1 edition 1988) page 231
When this obvious clamor of some of the most influential zionists for fascism is brought up, the usual apologist response is that “mainstream zionism” rejected fascism. This isn’t true.
Nahum Sokolow is as “mainstream” as you can get. Here he is sitting (right) among the (public) architects of the Balfour Declaration:
Nahum Sokolow (Chairman of Zionist Executive, leader of WZO and intermediary for the Balfour Declaration) not only praised Mussolini but announced his firm belief that Fascism was immune from anti-Semitic preconceptions:
“we begin to understand its (fascism’s) true nature … true Jews have never fought against you”.
These words, a Zionist endorsement of the Fascist regime, were echoed in Jewish periodicals all over the world…expressions of loyalty and affection for Fascism poured out of the Jewish centers of Italy.”
— MICHAEL LEDEEN, a “specialist” on Fascism and the Jewish question. And himself a zionist spy.
Then there is Joachim Prinz who is branded an extremist or “naive”:
“We want assimilation to be replaced by a new law: the declaration of belonging to the Jewish nation and Jewish race. A state built upon the principle of the purity of nation and race can only honored and respected by a Jew who declares his belonging to his own kind. Having so declared himself, he will never be capable of faulty loyalty towards a state. The state cannot want other Jews but such as declare themselves as belonging to their nation. It will not want Jewish flatterers and crawlers. It must demand of us faith and loyalty to our own interest. For only he who honors his own breed and his own blood can have an attitude of honor towards the national will of other nations.”
— “We Jews”, Joachim Prinz, 1934
Joachim Prinz
Like Sokolow, Prinz was not insignificant. Or considered “extreme”.
Joachim Prinz held top leadership positions in the World Jewish Congress, as president of the American Jewish Congress from 1958–1966, and as Chairman of the World Conference of Jewish Organizations. Later, he was a director of the Conference of Jewish Material Claims Against Germany.
Prinz emigrated to the USA, where he rose to be vice-chairman of the World Jewish Congress and a leading light in the World Zionist Organization, published in 1934 a special book, Wir Juden (We Jews), to celebrate Hitler’s so-called German Revolution and the defeat of liberalism:
“The meaning of the German Revolution for the German nation will eventually be clear to those who have created it and formed its image. Its meaning for us must be set forth here: the fortunes of liberalism are lost. The only form of political life which has helped Jewish assimilation is sunk.”
«The victory of Nazism rules out assimilation and mixed marriages as an option for Jews. ‘We are not unhappy about this,” said Dr Prinz.
«The whole book is full of similar crude flatteries of Nazi ideology, glee at the defeat of liberalism and particularly of the ideas of the French Revolution, and great expectations that, in the congenial myth of the Aryan race, Zionism and the myth of the Jewish race will also thrive.»
— Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years, Israel Shahak, 1994, pp 71-72
https://archive.org/details/11ShahakJewishHistoryJewishReligion/page/n5/mode/2up
The “crude flatteries” that Israel Shahak describes weren’t sourced to just this one individual. They were the same expressions of the German Zionist Federation.
The Nuremburg Laws were introduced by nazi Germany in 1935. Zionist Jews in Germany welcomed these laws:
“Germany … is meeting the demands of the World Zionist Congress when it declares the Jews now living in Germany to be a national minority..Germany has given the Jewish minority the opportunity to live for itself, and is offering state protection for this separate life of the Jewish minority: Jewry’s process of growth into a nation will thereby be encouraged and a contribution will be made to the establishment of more tolerable relations between the two nations.”
— Zionist Jüdische Rundschau editorial (1935) a few days after the Reichstag adopted the so-called “Nuremberg laws” that prohibited marriages and sexual relations between Jews and Germans and, in effect, proclaimed the Jews an alien minority nationality.
The laws stipulated that the only other flag allowed to be flown were the “Jewish colors” (Star of David):
Paragraph 4 in “The Laws for the Protection of German Blood and German Honour”, part of the infamous Nazi Nuremberg Laws of 1935, states that 1. “Jews are forbidden to display the Reich and national flag or the [German] national colours. 2. On the other hand, they are permitted to display the Jewish colours. The exercise of this right is protected by the State.”
«Translation: Nuremberg Race Laws». Holocaust Encyclopedia. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Retrieved 6 March 2015.
“…Zionism became the only other party legalized in the Reich, the Zionist flag the only other flag permitted to fly in Nazi-land.“
— “Baal is not God’, Congress Bulletin (24 January 1936), p. 2., Rabbi Stephen Wise
— ‘Zionism in the Age of the Dictators’, Lenni Brenner
And while apologists claim that fascism was rejected after Hitler came to power in the early 1930s, it most definitely was not. Diaspora Jews who rejected Hitler were given a back seat in 1933 when zionists in Tel Aviv sabotaged a global Jewish boycott and entered a trade agreement with Hitler’s Germany.
The claim that this trade agreement was entered to “save Jews” is also a lie. Jews were only “saved” as long as they made their way to Palestine to bolster their failing colonial project. Hundreds of thousands of Jews were thwarted in their escape from Europe by zionists.
A more detailed account on the zionist abandonment and manipulation of European Jews can be read here:
https://spanishhalyon.wordpress.com/2018/03/08/zionism-very-dangerous-for-jews/
Another claim made is that revisionists were a minority. Or “extremists”. Even though Irgun was legitimized in 1948 to help ethnically cleanse and slaughter their way through Palestine. And let’s not forget that two of their leaders would become future Prime Ministers.
One was Yitzhak Shamir, one time leader of the Irgun splinter group, Lehi or “the Stern Gang”.
Who were Lehi? We have to look again at Abraham Stern.
In mid 1940, Abraham Stern’s Lehi movement (a faction of the Irgun) formulated what he called the “Jerusalem Agreement”:
“Zionism would come under the aegis of Italian fascism, with Haifa as its base, and the Old City of Jerusalem under Vatican control, except for the Jewish quarter” in return for Mussolini’s recognition and aid in obtaining Jewish sovereignty over Palestine.”
— Joseph Heller. The Stern Gang: Ideology, Politics, and Terror, 1940–1949 pp. 86, 78-79
The same year, Lehi offered an alliance with Germany:
The organization offered cooperation in the following terms: Lehi would rebel against the British, while Germany would recognize an independent Jewish state in Palestine/Eretz Israel, and all Jews leaving their homes in Europe, by their own will or because of government injunctions, could enter Palestine with no restriction of numbers.
Late in 1940, Lehi representative Naftali Lubenchik went to Beirut (which was still under the fascist French Vichy control) to meet German official Werner Otto von Hentig. The Lehi documents outlined that its rule would be authoritarian and indicated similiarites between the organization and Nazis.
— The Jews: A Contrary People Yehuda Bauer pages 77-78
Stern also proposed recruiting some 40,000 Jews from occupied Europe to invade Palestine with German support to oust the British. On 11 January 1941, Vice Admiral Ralf von der Marwitz, the German Naval attaché in Turkey, filed a report (the «Ankara document») conveying an offer by Lehi to «actively take part in the war on Germany’s side» in return for German support for «the establishment of the historic Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis, bound by a treaty with the German Reich.»
— Joseph Heller. The Stern Gang: Ideology, Politics, and Terror, 1940–1949, p86
— David Yisraeli, The Palestine Problem in German Politics, 1889–1945, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel, 1974. Verified web copies: GermanEnglish. Also see Otto von Hentig, Mein Leben (Goettingen, 1962) pp. 338–339
— Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators 2004, p234
Cover letter for the “Ankara document”
During an interview with Nicholas Bethell for his book, when Shamir was asked about JABOTINSKY’s revisionists collusion with the antisemitic Polish regime:
“It was a political agreement. They helped us for anti-Semitic reasons. We explained to them, ‘If you want to get rid of the Jews, you must help the Zionist movement.”
— Nicholas Bethell, The Palestine Triangle, p41
The other “outsider” was MENCHAMEN BEGIN, leader of the zionist militant group Irgun.
In 1948 a group of Jewish intellectuals, including Albert Einstein, wrote a letter of protest to The NY Times about Begin’s visit to the US:
“Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the “Freedom Party” (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.
The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United States is obviously calculated to give the impression of American support for his party in the coming Israeli elections, and to cement political ties with conservative Zionist elements in the United States.
Several Americans of national repute have lent their names to welcome his visit. It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughout the world, if correctly informed as to Mr. Begin’s political record and perspectives, could add their names and support to the movement he represents.”
…
“Within the Jewish community they have preached an admixture of ultranationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority. Like other Fascist parties they have been used to break strikes, and have themselves pressed for the destruction of free trade unions. In their stead they have proposed corporate unions on the Italian Fascist model.”
[Letter to the New York Times from Jewish intellectuals including Albert Einstein, Hannah Arendt, and Sidney Hook that appeared on December 4, 1948.]
http://users.physics.harvard.edu/~wilson/NYTimes1948.html
In view of Lehi’s participitation in the slaughter and ethnic cleansing in Palestine in 1948, and just before the first Israeli elections in January 1949, a general amnesty to Lehi members was granted by the government.
— Ami Pedahzur, Arie Perliger Jewish Terrorism in Israel, Columbia University Press, 2011 p.28
And in 1980, the supposed stigma of Lehi was eradicated when the Israeli Ministry of Defense began to award ribbons to members of Lehi between 1940 and 1948 (when they were formed and when they were disbanded).
Israeli Ministry of Defense . https://web.archive.org/web/20060417155325/http://www.mod.gov.il:80/pages/heritage/Awards.asp#lechi . 17 April 2006 . 17 September 2018 .
CONCLUSION
There can be no doubt that zionism is a fascist philosophy. JABOTINSKY’s philosophy is today’s blueprint for zionist policy in Palestine. Word for word.
There is no “left wing” or “centrist” political movement within zionism. How can there be when the “state” was founded on ethnic cleansing, carried out by the so-called founders of Israel who are supposed to represent the mainstream? How can there be a “moderate” zionism when it’s existence is upheld by apartheid?
When I said that the only characteristic missing to fully define zionism as fascism was that there is no dictator, I should point out that no dictator, in the form of a “personality”, is necessary. How so? Because no matter who is elected through it’s apartheid system of “democracy”, a Jewish zionist always comes to power with the same uncompromising message. The message that’s contained in JABOTINSKY’s “The Iron Wall”.
spanishhalyon 
Un comentario en “Hebrew Fascism”